Life with Linux

by on March 25, 2007

There are some posts that no real blog can be complete without, and that is some opinion about Linux. I’ve been using Ubuntu for over a year now and it occurs to me that I should write up something on it. Not that anyone’s asked, but then that’s what blogging is all about really isn’t it?

I switched from Windows to Ubuntu for no reason other than I wanted to see what it was like. I kept my Windows install in place on a dual-boot just in case, but mainly because I need access to Windows from time to time in order to work from home. Since installing Ubuntu, I’ve experimented with OpenSuSE and Kubuntu for a few months, but went back to Ubuntu when the Edgy release came out. I have a two year old Dell Dimension 5100, upgraded with an NVidia 7300GT video card.


At first, there was some mild anxiety to do with whether Linux would be up to the job of handling things like my Firewire video camera (Sony PC110), external Sony Memorystick reader and other stuff. I found that while it’s a little temperamental with peripherals (as indeed Windows can be), things pretty much just worked in terms of being detected. The only significant problem with external filesystems (like my USB Memorystick) is Ubuntu’s insistence in mounting these as root. The same goes for the Firewire: the only way I can control the camera is to start the controller app (Kino) as the super-user.

This is bar far and away the most serious problem with Ubuntu in my opinion. Luckily though, it’s really the only problem I’ve encountered. I assume there is some theoretical security reason why these devices should not be accessed by a normal user, but I’m buggered if I can think what that is. Thank god for gksudo.

There really is nothing much else to report. I have no problems running Linux, and Ubuntu (for me) seems the best distribution of that right now. The usability of Gnome is, I would say, as good as Windows in most respects. That isn’t saying very much, mind you, but it’s certainly not a negative factor.

Overall, the most positive thing about Ubuntu is the lack of nagging. The lack of Big Brother in the form of anti-piracy, licences, restrictions and other cramps on your style is just wonderful. It also exposes the twisted knots that some third party Windows applications get themselves in just to squeeze a few extra pennies out of you. It’s a delight to use CD/DVD burning software like Gnomebaker after the revolting usuries of Nero and its hideously over-complicated interface. Gnomebaker shows how easy burning a CD should be because it’s written by people who have the right priorities. This is a common pattern elsewhere too. The likes of AOL or Dell or HP any other of the big consumer computing brands are wholly absent from a fresh installation of Ubuntu, leaving you free to just use things without being harassed as if in some virtual souk.

I think Ubuntu (and GNU/Linux) can be as good, if not a better to use as Windows. In that sense at least, the creation of a multi-billion dollar corporation comes out really rather poorly against the output of as disparate band of worldwide volunteers. Who’d have though it? I’m a fan.

Comments

Yes, but on the other hand, if you are a graphic of web designer, on Linux you won’t be able to run, for example, Macromedia Fireworks (my tool of preference) or Adobe Photoshop. And that’s a major nuisance… (You can use them on Mac, of course, but then comes the higher price for a Mac and the licensed software, again…)

And it’s a pity Adobe/Macromedia still do not plan to make some of their software available for Linux, unfortunately… (even for the upcoming CS3 later this year)

How then once can work entirely on Linux, if the software he/she needs can work only on Mac/Win?…

Apart from that, coding html/css/php/ etc. can be done pretty well on Linux, too.

I have tried Debian, I think, some time ago, in the office, dual-boot system with WinXP:

1) Our printer (laser Canon multi-device) rejected any tries to work with any Linux… No drivers for Linux were found, compiled or not, so to print in Linux was impossible.

2) My LG DVD+/-R/RW/DL wasn’t recognized as burning device… Hm…

3) Apart from the graphic interface, still a lor of things must be done using command line or logging-in as root… which is not the case in Windows.

Plus, I use Macromedia (now Adobe) Fireworks on a daily basis… So Linux didn’t live long on my machine:)

It’ll be interesting how software will evolve these days… And shall we see or not a major software publisher (like Adobe) to port at least some of its software to Linux?…

As said someone in the comments for this exceelent article, “Dreamweaver was meant to run on Windows” :-)))

I guess you can make it run on Linux or FreeBSD… but do not expect same productivity and functionality in this case or if program is emulated…

…we should wait maybe until Adobe starts to look seriously at the Linux market:)

BTW… if you succeed to run Fireworks and Dreamweaver on Linux, please report, I’ll be very interested to hear to results of the experiment! Might come handy, one day :)

Did you try hard enough? :-D

Just joking…;-)

Even if it would work, Fireworks/DW will be slower, anyway… They are not written for Linux:(

Maybe one day:) Let’s wait and see what Adobe/Macromedia will do:)

Actually I run photoshop (7/8/CS) in linux and also Macromedia Dreamweaver/Fireworks MX versions for many years already.

There are a few methods. Full virtualisation with virtualbox or vmware or emulation with wine or crossover office.

Both work well, good luck trying!

I see Dell have finally got round to reading your blog and start selling kit with Linux installed – a gentle tap on a nail in Bill G’s coffin?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>